Filed under: Uncategorized
The news of this evening’s trolley crash in Newton, MA, kinda shook up The IP. His concern goes out to all involved. The IP knows that that every one in his family has ingrained memories about the D Line. It’s amazing that so many people in Boston still commute by trolley. The D Line is actually a former steam railroad line, so it’s rides like a trolley but commutes like a train. It still works like it did in 1850.
The below article has an uncanny immediacy about it. The reporters really committed to the witness interviews and let those guide the piece:
Multiple injuries, operator trapped, after trolleys collide in Newton
May 28, 2008 09:28 PM
By Noah Bierman and James Vaznis, Globe Staff
A trolley car on the D branch of the Green Line in Newton smashed into another car from behind this afternoon, injuring multiple people. The operator of one of the trolleys is still trapped, the MBTA said.
The operator, who is a woman, suffered injuries that “appear to be very serious,” said Joe Pesaturo, spokesman for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.
Pesaturo said one two-car trolley rear-ended the second as both headed westbound, away from Boston.
The collision occurred at about 6 p.m. on the way into the Woodland station. The trolley that was rear-ended was just emerging from a scheduled stop-light when it was hit from behind, he said. The operator who was trapped was the one in the train in the rear, Pesaturo said.
Six people were taken to local hospitals with non-life-threatening injuries, one was Medflighted to Boston Medical Center, and five were treated and released at the scene, said Pesaturo.
Frank Lam, 41, of Natick was commuting home from his computer job in the frontmost trolley.
“Basically, what happened is we were at a stop, and we just got plowed into by second train,” he said.
He said a few people were thrown around at the time of the impact, but “for the most part everybody was able to walk off the train.”
He said he went to the trolley behind to see if he could help and found one woman trapped but conscious, “wedged into a corner,” and then went out to the front of the trolley and saw through an opening a blue shirt that appeared to belong to the train operator.
“All I saw was a T blue shirt. It looked like her back or something,” he said.
Aerial pictures of the scene shown by local TV stations showed smashed trolley cars, rescue vehicles clustering at the scene, and injured people being placed on stretchers.
The footage also showed rescue workers gathering around the front of one smashed car.
Matt Stone, 46, an accounting manager from Framingham, was also sitting in the frontmost trolley, on his way to pick up his car at the Riverside station at the tail end of the same commute he has made for the past 3 years.
“We were stopped and all of a sudden we got hit from behind and there was no warning, nothing,” Stone said. “There was two separate impacts: the first knocked me off my seat, the next knocked me across the aisle.”
Stone was lightly bruised. Most of the 20 to 25 people on his train were not seriously injured, but a few appeared to be badly hurt, he said.
“One woman hit her face on the seat and had blood from a cut on her nose,” Stone said. “There was a 70-year-old old guy who went ballistic screaming at the conductor, ‘You killed my wife! You killed my wife!’ And the wife is going, ‘I’m OK! I’m OK.’”
After the crash, “Somebody started saying, ‘The train behind is on fire, and we got to get outta here,’” Stone said. The passengers got off, briefly got on another train that was facing the opposite direction, then got off that train because it was stuck behind the crash, and walked along the tracks to the Riverside Station.
Jack Condon, 74, a Dorset Road resident, said, “I was going for a walk and I heard a crash and I said ‘Uh-oh, this is a bad one’ and then I heard what I thought were a couple of explosions, or at least they sounded like they were explosions.”
He said he thought it might be a car accident on the nearby highway and then he saw “all the ambulances, and that’s when I knew it was a train.”
Steve Cadrain, a neighborhood resident, said he ran down to the accident site, jumping a fence and boarded one of the damaged trolleys.
“I went on the train, there was virtually no blood. There was one woman who was bleeding.”
He said he saw a female conductor walking off the trolley, “looking for a friend.” He said he thought she might have been looking for the operator who was trapped in the front part of the trolley.
Joyce Friedman, also a neighborhood resident, said neighbors offered to open up their houses to victims, but none of them took advantage of the offer.
“It was a huge, huge crash. It sounded like an explosion,” she said. “I thought it was an enormous truck crash on Beacon Street. We never think of the Green Line running behind our houses.”
“It was like an accordion, the two front ends squished together,” she said.
The line has been shut down in the area, and shuttle bus service is running between Reservoir and Riverside, the MBTA announced on its website.
Ralph Ranalli, Michael Levenson, and Rachana Rathi of the Globe staff contributed to this report, along with Globe correspondents John M. Guilfoil, Jill Jorgensen, and Matt Collette.
That reporting is great. The IP especially likes this quote:
“I went on the train, there was virtually no blood. There was one woman who was bleeding.”
WTF!!! That was brilliant!! He says there was “virtually” no blood, but then hits you with the whammy “There was one woman who was bleeding.” You can’t script stuff like that.
Anywaze. That a trolley can rear-end another trolley is nuts in 2008. The IP feels most safe on that electric train at Hartsfield ATL; it has NO human operators. But let’s not blame the motorwoman on the D Line. No decent rail system would be designed to let such an accident happen…maybe in 1850, but not in 2008.
9 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Yikes! Woodland! My alma mater!
Comment by Marlone May 29, 2008 @ 3:20 amShe’s dead, Jim.
Poor fella.
Comment by Anonymous May 29, 2008 @ 11:57 amI suspect a cellphone was involved.
But really… most subways have automatic controls to stop trolleys which blow past red signals.
Comment by Anonymous May 29, 2008 @ 12:00 pmThese can be overridden by the operator if the way is safe.
The Highland Branch? Nope. It’s all the operator.
Yeah buddy. That whole line is a throwback. Sometimes rusticity is nice, but it can also become deadly.
The IP used to hitch-hike to Woodland Station all the time…crazy to think.
Comment by IP May 29, 2008 @ 1:11 pmI agree, it is crazy that they still use thse oly trolleys. There have been a number of accidents over the last few months, though I think this is the worst. Even so, it could have been worse. The death of the conducter, Edmunds, is particularly tragic. The injuries to the commuters are also really unfortunate, even those that weren’t reported. Still, in situations like this it is best to pursue justice as well. Those involved do not have to sit by an do nothing. I know that The Shepard Law Firm of Boston, for example, handles cases like this, and they set up a hotline in order to help people: 800-451-4471 or you could just go to their site: http://www.shepardlawfirm.com/?pageId=278
Comment by Lawyercentral May 29, 2008 @ 4:07 pmLocal TV channel 5 had non-stop coverage for two hours. It was clear fairly soon from the very long delay in extricating the operator (still no success after 2 hrs.) that this was a fatality.Very sad.
Comment by Dr. Kinbote May 29, 2008 @ 6:32 pmThere is no excuse for this-fail-safe braking & track occupancy systems have been available for years (This crash was not likely due to operator error)
My only trouble event was snow pile-up one time in Brookline-had to take a bus from Resevoir
station. Lawsuits are forthcoming!
Hey Doc K.,
This crash _WAS_ most likely due to operator error.
I do not trust your analysis of the news (which is also pretty faulty).
In other areas you’re top-notch.
But I’ve ridden the line with a operator, who knew when and where he could exceed the speed limits and still brake for signals – and in my experience (watching the speedo for that stretch of ROW), the operators routinely exceeded the limits to maintain headway and account for boarding delays at stations due to slow/blocked/inattentive passengers.
Most auto drivers exceed limits, too.
Because they can, even if they can’t see around a curve and the person crossing the street.
My cellphone suspicions were apparently justified. It appears to be a case of distracted driving, she missed a signal, did not slow, and rear-ended the trolley ahead apparently without even touching the brakes. Suicide or poor work habits?
_IF_ the investigation continues to verify this theory, human error was responsible.
They should have some automatic braking systems on this line, but since these trolleys are also used for streetcar lines, human control is the way they roll.
Comment by Kenneth Buttercup June 2, 2008 @ 1:41 pmHey, Lawyer Central.
The trolleys aren’t old.
It’s the signalling system and operational rules that are old.
S.T.F.U. and go promote the law firm elsewhere, douchebag. Or at least don’t make the firm appear to be idiots who cannot spell and don’t know that much.
Comment by Kenneth Buttercup June 2, 2008 @ 1:46 pmUpdate
Comment by Anonymous June 2, 2008 @ 2:03 pm